Relation of Believers to the Law and to Christ
Recurring to the statement of
that believers are "not under the law but under grace," the apostle
here shows how this change is brought about, and what holy
consequences follow from it.
1. I speak to them that know the law--of Moses to whom, though
not themselves Jews (see on
the Old Testament was familiar.
2, 3. if her husband be dead--"die." So
3. she be married--"joined." So
4. Wherefore . . . ye also are become dead--rather, "were slain."
to the law by the body of Christ--through His slain body. The apostle
here departs from his usual word "died," using the more expressive
phrase "were slain," to make it clear that he meant their being
"crucified with Christ"
(as expressed in
and Ga 2:20).
that ye should be married to another, even to him that is--"was."
raised from the dead--to the intent.
that we should bring forth fruit unto God--It has been thought that the
apostle should here have said that "the law died to us," not "we to
the law," but that purposely inverted the figure, to avoid the harshness
to Jewish ears of the death of the law
PHILIPPI, &c.]. But this is to mistake the apostle's design in
employing this figure, which was merely to illustrate the general
principle that "death dissolves legal obligation." It was essential
to his argument that we, not the law, should be the dying party,
since it is we that are "crucified with Christ," and not the law. This
death dissolves our marriage obligation to the law, leaving us at
liberty to contract a new relation--to be joined to the Risen One, in
order to spiritual fruitfulness, to the glory of God [BEZA,
ALFORD, &c.]. The confusion, then, is in the expositors, not the
text; and it has arisen from not observing that, like Jesus Himself,
believers are here viewed as having a double life--the old sin-condemned
life, which they lay down with Christ, and the new life of acceptance
and holiness to which they rise with their Surety and Head; and all the
issues of this new life, in Christian obedience, are regarded as the
"fruit" of this blessed union to the Risen One. How such holy
fruitfulness was impossible before our union to Christ, is next
5. For when we were in the flesh--in our unregenerate state, as
we came into the world. See on
the motions--"passions" (Margin), "affections"
of sins--that is, "prompting to the commission of sins."
which were by the law--by occasion of the law, which fretted,
irritated our inward corruption by its prohibitions. See on
did work in our members--the members of the body, as the
instruments by which these inward stirrings find vent in action, and
become facts of the life. See on
to bring forth fruit unto death--death in the sense of
Thus hopeless is all holy fruit before union to Christ.
6. But now--On the same expression, see on
we are delivered from the law--The word is the same which, in
and elsewhere, is rendered "destroyed," and is but another way of
saying (as in
that "we were slain to the law by the body of Christ"; language
which, though harsh to the ear, is designed and fitted to impress upon
the reader the violence of that death of the Cross, by which, as
by a deadly wrench, we are "delivered from the law."
that being dead wherein we were held--It is now universally agreed
that the true reading here is, "being dead to that wherein we were
held." The received reading has no authority whatever, and is
inconsistent with the strain of the argument; for the death spoken of,
as we have seen, is not the law's, but ours, through union with the
that we should--"so as to" or "so that we."
serve in newness of spirit--"in the newness of the spirit."
and not in the oldness of the letter--not in our old way of literal,
mechanical obedience to the divine law, as a set of external rules of
conduct, and without any reference to the state of our hearts; but in
that new way of spiritual obedience which, through union to the risen
Saviour, we have learned to render (compare
False Inferences regarding the Law Repelled
in the case of the UNREGENERATE.
7, 8. What . . . then? Is the law sin? God forbid!--"I have said that
when we were in the flesh the law stirred our inward corruption, and was
thus the occasion of deadly fruit: Is then the law to blame for
this? Far from us be such a thought."
Nay--"On the contrary" (as in
I had not known sin but by the law--It is important to fix what is
meant by "sin" here. It certainly is not "the general nature of sin"
[ALFORD, &c.], though it be true that this is learned from the law; for
such a sense will not suit what is said of it in the following verses,
where the meaning is the same as here. The only meaning which suits all
that is said of it in this place is "the principle of sin in the
heart of fallen man." The sense, then, is this: "It was by means of the
law that I came to know what a virulence and strength of sinful
propensity I had within me." The existence of this it did not need
the law to reveal to him; for even the heathens recognized and wrote of
it. But the dreadful nature and desperate power of it the law alone
discovered--in the way now to be described.
for I had not known lust, except, &c.--Here the same Greek word
is unfortunately rendered by three different English ones--"lust";
--which obscures the meaning. By using the word "lust" only, in the
wide sense of all "irregular desire," or every outgoing of the heart
towards anything forbidden, the sense will best be brought out; thus,
"For I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not
lust; But sin, taking ('having taken') occasion by the commandment
(that one which forbids it), wrought in me all manner of lusting." This
gives a deeper view of the tenth commandment than the mere words
suggest. The apostle saw in it the prohibition not only of desire after
certain things there specified, \ but of "desire after
everything divinely forbidden"; in other words, all "lusting" or
"irregular desire." It was this which "he had not known but by the
law." The law forbidding all such desire so stirred his corruption that
it wrought in him "all manner of lusting"--desire of every sort after
what was forbidden.
8. For without the law--that is, before its extensive demands and
prohibitions come to operate upon our corrupt nature.
sin was--rather, "is"
dead--that is, the sinful principle of our nature lies so dormant, so
torpid, that its virulence and power are unknown, and to our feeling it
is as good as "dead."
9. For I was alive without the law once--"In the days of my ignorance,
when, in this sense, a stranger to the law, I deemed myself a righteous
man, and, as such, entitled to life at the hand of God."
but when the commandment came--forbidding all irregular desire; for
the apostle sees in this the spirit of the whole law.
sin revived--"came to life"; in its malignity and strength it
unexpectedly revealed itself, as if sprung from the dead.
and I died--"saw myself, in the eye of a law never kept and not to
be kept, a dead man."
10, 11. And--thus.
the commandment, which was, &c.--designed
life--through the keeping of it.
I found to be unto death--through breaking it.
For sin--my sinful nature.
taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me--or "seduced
me"--drew me aside into the very thing which the commandment forbade.
and by it slew me--"discovered me to myself to be a condemned
and gone man" (compare
12, 13. Wherefore--"So that."
the law is--"is indeed"
good, and the commandment--that one so often referred to, which
forbids all lusting.
holy, and just, and good.
13. Was then that which is good made--"Hath then that which is good
death unto me? God forbid--that is, "Does the blame of my death
lie with the good law? Away with such a thought."
But sin--became death unto me, to the end.
that it might appear sin--that it might be seen in its true light.
working death in--rather, "to"
me by that which is good, that sin by the commandment might become
exceeding sinful--"that its enormous turpitude might stand out to
view, through its turning God's holy, just, and good law into a
provocative to the very things which is forbids." So much for the
law in relation to the unregenerate, of whom the apostle takes
himself as the example; first, in his ignorant, self-satisfied
condition; next, under humbling discoveries of his inability to keep
the law, through inward contrariety to it; finally, as self-condemned,
and already, in law, a dead man. Some inquire to what period of his
recorded history these circumstances relate. But there is no reason to
think they were wrought into such conscious and explicit discovery at
any period of his history before he "met the Lord in the way"; and
though, "amidst the multitude of his thoughts within him" during his
memorable three day's blindness immediately after that, such views of
the law and of himself would doubtless be tossed up and down till they
took shape much as they are here described (see on
we regard this whole description of his inward struggles and progress
rather as the finished result of all his past recollections and
subsequent reflections on his unregenerate state, which he throws into
historical form only for greater vividness. But now the apostle
proceeds to repel false inferences regarding the law, secondly:
in the case of the REGENERATE; taking himself here
also as the example.
14. For we know that the law is spiritual--in its demands.
but I am carnal--fleshly (see on
and as such, incapable of yielding spiritual obedience.
sold under sin--enslaved to it. The "I" here, though of course not
the regenerate, is neither the unregenerate, but the sinful
principle of the renewed man, as is expressly stated in
15, 16. For, &c.--better, "For that which I do I know not"; that is,
"In obeying the impulses of my carnal nature I act the slave of another
will than my own as a renewed man?"
for, &c.--rather, "for not what I would (wish, desire) that do I,
but what I hate that I do."
16. If then I do that which I would not--"But if what I would not that
I consent unto the law that it is good--"the judgment of my inner
man going along with the law."
17. Now then it is no more I--my renewed self.
that do it--"that work it."
but sin which dwelleth in me--that principle of sin that still
has its abode in me. To explain this and the following statements, as
many do (even
of the sins of unrenewed men against their better convictions, is to do
painful violence to the apostle's language, and to affirm of the
unregenerate what is untrue. That coexistence and mutual hostility of
"flesh" and "spirit" in the same renewed man, which is so clearly
&c., and in
&c., is the true and only key to the language of this and the following
verses. (It is hardly necessary to say that the apostle means not to
disown the blame of yielding to his corruptions, by saying, "it is not
he that does it, but sin that dwelleth in him." Early heretics thus
abused his language; but the whole strain of the passage shows that his
sole object in thus expressing himself was to bring more vividly before
his readers the conflict of two opposite principles, and how entirely,
as a new man--honoring from his inmost soul the law of God--he
condemned and renounced his corrupt nature, with its affections and
lusts, its stirrings and its outgoings, root and branch).
18. For, &c.--better, "For I know that there dwelleth not in me,
that is in my flesh, any good."
for to will--"desire."
is present with me; but how to perform that which is good%