King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page

Bad Advertisement?

News & Reviews:
  • World News
  • Movie Reviews
  • Book Search

    Are you a Christian?

    Online Store:
  • Your Own eBook/eBay Business
  • Visit Our eBay Store

    Automated eBook Business

  • PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - 1 Timothy 5:1

    CHAPTERS: 1 Timothy 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6     

    VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25




    LXX- Greek Septuagint - 1 Timothy 5:1

    πρεσβυτερω 4245 μη 3361 επιπληξης 1969 5661 αλλα 235 παρακαλει 3870 5720 ως 5613 πατερα 3962 νεωτερους 3501 ως 5613 αδελφους 80

    Douay Rheims Bible

    An ancient man rebuke not, but entreat him as a father: young
    men, as brethren:

    King James Bible - 1 Timothy 5:1

    Rebuke not an elder, but intreat him as a father; and the younger
    men as brethren;

    World English Bible

    Don't rebuke an older man, but exhort him as a father; the younger
    men as brothers;

    Early Church Father Links

    Npnf-102 v.IV_1.16 Pg 5, Npnf-102 v.IV_1.20 Pg 7, Npnf-113 v.iii.xiv Pg 20, Npnf-113 v.iii.xiv Pg 22, Npnf-212 iii.iv.iv.ii Pg 41, Npnf-212 ii.iv.xiv Pg 10, Npnf-213 ii.v.i Pg 5, Npnf-213 ii.v.xlv Pg 9

    World Wide Bible Resources

    1Timothy 5:1

    Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325)

    Anf-01 Pg 12
    Deut. xxxiii. 9.

    But who are they that have left father and mother, and have said adieu to all their neighbours, on account of the word of God and His covenant, unless the disciples of the Lord? Of whom again Moses says, “They shall have no inheritance, for the Lord Himself is their inheritance.”3890


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xlv Pg 24
    Tertullian seems with reflect the early view of the church as to our Lord’s total abnegation of all filial relations with the Virgin, when He gave to her St. John, instead of Himself, on the Cross. For this purpose He had made him the beloved disciple and doubtless charged him with all the duties with which he was to be clothed.  Thus He fulfilled the figurative law of His priesthood, as given by Moses, (Deut. xxxiii. 9.) and crucified himself, from the beginning, according to his own Law (Luke xiv. 26–27.) which he identifies with the Cross, here and also in Matt. x. 37–38. These then are the steps of His own holy example, illustrating His own precept, for doubtless, as “the Son of man,” His filial love was superlative and made the sacrifice the sharper: (1.) He taught Joseph that He had no earthly father, when he said—“Wist ye not that I must be in my Father’s house,” (Luke iii. 49., Revised); but, having established this fact, he then became “subject” to both his parents, till His public ministry began. (2.) At this time, He seems to have admonished His mother, that He could not recognize her authority any longer, (John ii. 4.) having now entered upon His work as the Son of God. (3.) Accordingly, He refused, thenceforth, to know her save only as one of His redeemed, excepting her in nothing from this common work for all the Human Race, (Matt. xii. 48) in the passage which Tertullian so forcibly expounds. (4.) Finally, when St. Mary draws near to the cross, apparently to claim the final recognition of the previous understanding (John ii. 4.) to which the Lord had referred her at Cana—He fulfils His last duty to her in giving her a son instead of Himself, and thereafter (5) recognizes her no more; not even in His messages after the Resurrection, nor when He met her with other disciples. He rewards her, instead, with the infinite love He bears to all His saints, and with the brightest rewards which are bestowed upon Faith. In this consists her superlative excellence and her conspicuous glory among the Redeemed (Luke i. 47–48.) in Christ’s account.

    Anf-03 vi.iv.viii Pg 6
    i.e. no children even. The reference is apparently to Matt. x. 37 and Luke xiv. 26, with which may be compared Deut. xiii. 6–; 10 and xxxiii. 9. If Oehler’s reading, which I have followed, be correct, the precept, which is not verbally given till ages after Abraham, is made to have a retrospective force on him.

    He Himself, when tempted by the devil, demonstrated who it is that presides over and is the originator of temptation.8820


    Npnf-201 Pg 11

    Anf-03 v.iv.v.iii Pg 9
    See Gal. ii. 13, 14.

    ) for “not walking uprightly according to the truth of the gospel,”3551

    3551 Compare what has been already said in book i. chap. 20, and below in book v. chap. 3. See also Tertullian’s treatise, De Præscript. Hæret. chap. 23. [Kaye, p. 275.]

    as well as accuses certain false apostles of perverting the gospel of Christ), labours very hard to destroy the character3552

    3552 Statum.

    of those Gospels which are published as genuine3553

    3553 Propria.

    and under the name of apostles, in order, forsooth, to secure for his own Gospel the credit which he takes away from them. But then, even if he censures Peter and John and James, who were thought to be pillars, it is for a manifest reason. They seemed to be changing their company3554

    3554 Variare convictum.

    from respect of persons. And yet as Paul himself “became all things to all men,”3555


    Anf-03 Pg 30
    Victus: see Gal. ii. 12; or, living, see ver. 14.

    which he varied according to the sort of persons (whom he associated with) “fearing them which were of the circumcision,”5296


    Edersheim Bible History

    Lifetimes ix.ix Pg 50.1

    Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 5

    VERSE 	(1) - 

    :19,20 Le 19:32 De 33:9 Ga 2:11-14


    God Rules.NET