| |  |
PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Leviticus 27:26
CHAPTERS: Leviticus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 
VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
TEXT: BIB | AUDIO: MISLR - MISC | VIDEO: BIB
ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE
HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB
|
LXX- Greek Septuagint - Leviticus 27:26 και 2532 παν 3956 πρωτοτοκον 4416 ο 3588 3739 αν 302 γενηται 1096 5638 εν 1722 1520 τοις 3588 κτηνεσιν σου 4675 εσται 2071 5704 τω 3588 κυριω 2962 και 2532 ου 3739 3757 καθαγιασει ουθεις αυτο 846 εαν 1437 τε 5037 μοσχον 3448 εαν 1437 τε 5037 προβατον 4263 τω 3588 κυριω 2962 εστιν 2076 5748
Douay Rheims Bible The firstborn, which belong to the Lord, no man may sanctify and vow: whether it be bullock, or sheep, they are the Lord's.
King James Bible - Leviticus 27:26 Only the firstling of the beasts, which should be the LORD's firstling, no man shall sanctify it; whether it be ox, or sheep: it is the LORD's.
World English Bible "'Only the firstborn among animals, which is made a firstborn to Yahweh, no man may dedicate it; whether an ox or sheep, it is Yahweh's.
World Wide Bible Resources
Leviticus 27:26
Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325) Anf-01 ix.ii.iv Pg 20
Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23. For He, being everything, opened the womb2697 2697 Not as being born of it, but as fecundating it, and so producing a manifold offspring. See below. of the enthymesis of the suffering Æon, when it had been expelled from the Pleroma. This they also style the second Ogdoad, of which we shall speak presently. And they state that it was clearly on this account that Paul said, “And He Himself is all things;”2698 2698
Anf-03 v.vii.xxiii Pg 14
Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23. For who is really holy but the Son of God? Who properly opened the womb but He who opened a closed one?7262 7262 Clausam: i.e. a virgin’s. But it is marriage which opens the womb in all cases. The virgin’s womb, therefore, was especially7263 7263 Magis. opened, because it was especially closed. Indeed7264 7264 Utique. she ought rather to be called not a virgin than a virgin, becoming a mother at a leap, as it were, before she was a wife. And what must be said more on this point? Since it was in this sense that the apostle declared that the Son of God was born not of a virgin, but “of a woman,” he in that statement recognised the condition of the “opened womb” which ensues in marriage.7265 7265 Nuptialem passionem. We read in Ezekiel of “a heifer7266 7266 Epiphanius (Hær. xxx. 30) quotes from the apocryphal Ezekiel this passage: Τέξεται ἡ δάμαλις, καὶ ἐροῦσιν—οὐ τέτοκεν. So Clem. Alex. Stromata, vii. Oehler. which brought forth, and still did not bring forth.” Now, see whether it was not in view of your own future contentions about the womb of Mary, that even then the Holy Ghost set His mark upon you in this passage; otherwise7267 7267 Ceterum. He would not, contrary to His usual simplicity of style (in this prophet), have uttered a sentence of such doubtful import, especially when Isaiah says, “She shall conceive and bear a son.”7268 7268
Anf-01 ix.ii.iv Pg 20
Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23. For He, being everything, opened the womb2697 2697 Not as being born of it, but as fecundating it, and so producing a manifold offspring. See below. of the enthymesis of the suffering Æon, when it had been expelled from the Pleroma. This they also style the second Ogdoad, of which we shall speak presently. And they state that it was clearly on this account that Paul said, “And He Himself is all things;”2698 2698
Anf-03 v.vii.xxiii Pg 14
Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23. For who is really holy but the Son of God? Who properly opened the womb but He who opened a closed one?7262 7262 Clausam: i.e. a virgin’s. But it is marriage which opens the womb in all cases. The virgin’s womb, therefore, was especially7263 7263 Magis. opened, because it was especially closed. Indeed7264 7264 Utique. she ought rather to be called not a virgin than a virgin, becoming a mother at a leap, as it were, before she was a wife. And what must be said more on this point? Since it was in this sense that the apostle declared that the Son of God was born not of a virgin, but “of a woman,” he in that statement recognised the condition of the “opened womb” which ensues in marriage.7265 7265 Nuptialem passionem. We read in Ezekiel of “a heifer7266 7266 Epiphanius (Hær. xxx. 30) quotes from the apocryphal Ezekiel this passage: Τέξεται ἡ δάμαλις, καὶ ἐροῦσιν—οὐ τέτοκεν. So Clem. Alex. Stromata, vii. Oehler. which brought forth, and still did not bring forth.” Now, see whether it was not in view of your own future contentions about the womb of Mary, that even then the Holy Ghost set His mark upon you in this passage; otherwise7267 7267 Ceterum. He would not, contrary to His usual simplicity of style (in this prophet), have uttered a sentence of such doubtful import, especially when Isaiah says, “She shall conceive and bear a son.”7268 7268
Anf-01 ix.ii.iv Pg 20
Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23. For He, being everything, opened the womb2697 2697 Not as being born of it, but as fecundating it, and so producing a manifold offspring. See below. of the enthymesis of the suffering Æon, when it had been expelled from the Pleroma. This they also style the second Ogdoad, of which we shall speak presently. And they state that it was clearly on this account that Paul said, “And He Himself is all things;”2698 2698
Anf-03 v.vii.xxiii Pg 14
Ex. xiii. 2; Luke ii. 23. For who is really holy but the Son of God? Who properly opened the womb but He who opened a closed one?7262 7262 Clausam: i.e. a virgin’s. But it is marriage which opens the womb in all cases. The virgin’s womb, therefore, was especially7263 7263 Magis. opened, because it was especially closed. Indeed7264 7264 Utique. she ought rather to be called not a virgin than a virgin, becoming a mother at a leap, as it were, before she was a wife. And what must be said more on this point? Since it was in this sense that the apostle declared that the Son of God was born not of a virgin, but “of a woman,” he in that statement recognised the condition of the “opened womb” which ensues in marriage.7265 7265 Nuptialem passionem. We read in Ezekiel of “a heifer7266 7266 Epiphanius (Hær. xxx. 30) quotes from the apocryphal Ezekiel this passage: Τέξεται ἡ δάμαλις, καὶ ἐροῦσιν—οὐ τέτοκεν. So Clem. Alex. Stromata, vii. Oehler. which brought forth, and still did not bring forth.” Now, see whether it was not in view of your own future contentions about the womb of Mary, that even then the Holy Ghost set His mark upon you in this passage; otherwise7267 7267 Ceterum. He would not, contrary to His usual simplicity of style (in this prophet), have uttered a sentence of such doubtful import, especially when Isaiah says, “She shall conceive and bear a son.”7268 7268
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 27VERSE (26) - Ex 13:2,12,13; 22:30 Nu 18:17 De 15:19
|
|
PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE
|
