Anf-03 v.iv.iii.xvii Pg 7
2 Kings xx. i.
and restoring his kingly state to the monarch of Babylon after his complete repentance;2903 2903
Anf-03 vi.iv.xxix Pg 12
See 2 Kings i.
Prayer is alone that which vanquishes8955 8955
Anf-03 v.iv.iii.xvii Pg 7
2 Kings xx. i.
and restoring his kingly state to the monarch of Babylon after his complete repentance;2903 2903
Anf-03 vi.iv.xxix Pg 12
See 2 Kings i.
Prayer is alone that which vanquishes8955 8955
Anf-02 vi.iii.ii.xi Pg 34.1
Anf-03 v.iv.iii.xvii Pg 7
2 Kings xx. i.
and restoring his kingly state to the monarch of Babylon after his complete repentance;2903 2903
Anf-03 vi.iv.xxix Pg 12
See 2 Kings i.
Prayer is alone that which vanquishes8955 8955
Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxiii Pg 27
2 Kings i. 9–12.
I recognise herein the severity of the Judge. And I, on the contrary, the severe rebuke4400 4400 I translate after Oehler’s text, which is supported by the oldest authorities. Pamelius and Rigaltius, however, read “Christi lenitatem increpantis eandem animadversionem,” etc. (“On the contrary, I recognize the gentleness of Christ, who rebuked His disciples when they,” etc.) This reading is only conjectural, suggested by the “Christi lenitatem” of the context.
of Christ on His disciples, when they were for inflicting4401 4401 Destinantes.
a like visitation on that obscure village of the Samaritans.4402 4402
Anf-03 v.iv.iii.xvii Pg 7
2 Kings xx. i.
and restoring his kingly state to the monarch of Babylon after his complete repentance;2903 2903
Anf-03 vi.iv.xxix Pg 12
See 2 Kings i.
Prayer is alone that which vanquishes8955 8955
Anf-03 iv.xi.xxxv Pg 16
Mal. iv. 5.
The fact, however, is, that their metempsychosis, or transmigration theory, signifies the recall of the soul which had died long before, and its return to some other body. But Elias is to come again, not after quitting life (in the way of dying), but after his translation (or removal without dying); not for the purpose of being restored to the body, from which he had not departed, but for the purpose of revisiting the world from which he was translated; not by way of resuming a life which he had laid aside, but of fulfilling prophecy,—really and truly the same man, both in respect of his name and designation, as well as of his unchanged humanity. How, therefore could John be Elias? You have your answer in the angel’s announcement: “And he shall go before the people,” says he, “in the spirit and power of Elias”—not (observe) in his soul and his body. These substances are, in fact, the natural property of each individual; whilst “the spirit and power” are bestowed as external gifts by the grace of God and so may be transferred to another person according to the purpose and will of the Almighty, as was anciently the case with respect to the spirit of Moses.1741 1741
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 8
VERSE (27) - :27 2Ki 1:3,4,8,12 Ezr 10:21,26 Mal 4:5
