King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page




Bad Advertisement?

News & Reviews:
  • World News
  • Movie Reviews
  • Book Search

    Are you a Christian?

    Online Store:
  • Your Own eBook/eBay Business
  • Visit Our eBay Store

    Automated eBook Business



  • PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Hosea 11:1


    CHAPTERS: Hosea 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14     
    VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

    TEXT: BIB   |   AUDIO: MISLR - DAVIS   |   VIDEO: BIB - COMM


    ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE

    HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB

    LXX- Greek Septuagint - Hosea 11:1

    διοτι 1360 νηπιος 3516 ισραηλ 2474 και 2532 εγω 1473 ηγαπησα 25 5656 αυτον 846 και 2532 εξ 1537 1803 αιγυπτου 125 μετεκαλεσα τα 3588 τεκνα 5043 αυτου 847

    Douay Rheims Bible

    As the morning passeth, so hath the king of Israel Israel was a
    child, and I loved him: and I called my son out of Egypt.

    King James Bible - Hosea 11:1

    When Israel was a
    child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.

    World English Bible

    "When Israel was a
    child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.

    Early Church Father Links

    Anf-08 vii.xi Pg 29, Npnf-114 iv.xv Pg 21, Npnf-114 v.xv Pg 21, Npnf-203 vi.xii.ii.xxvi Pg 5, Npnf-206 v.LVII Pg 50, Npnf-206 vii.iii.ii Pg 2, Npnf-207 iii.xix Pg 7

    World Wide Bible Resources


    Hosea 11:1

    Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325)

    Anf-01 ix.vi.x Pg 20
    Ex. xx. 12, LXX.

    For the true God did confess the commandment of the law as the word of God, and called no one else God besides His own Father.


    Anf-02 vi.iv.iii Pg 215.1


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxv Pg 50
    Ex. xx. 12 and Deut. vi. 2.

    and the Lord to have therefore answered him according to the law, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength,”4513

    4513


    Anf-03 v.iv.vi.xviii Pg 42
    Ex. xx. 12.

    Again, (the apostle writes:) “Parents, bring up your children in the fear and admonition of the Lord.”6043

    6043


    Anf-03 iv.ix.ii Pg 8
    Deut. vi. 4, 5; Lev. xix. 18; comp. Matt. xxii. 34–40; Mark xii. 28–34; Luke x. 25–28; and for the rest, Ex. xx. 12–17; Deut. v. 16–21; Rom. xiii. 9.

    Thou shalt not kill; Thou shalt not commit adultery; Thou shalt not steal; False witness thou shalt not utter; Honour thy father and mother; and, That which is another’s, shalt thou not covet.  For the primordial law was given to Adam and Eve in paradise, as the womb of all the precepts of God. In short, if they had loved the Lord their God, they would not have contravened His precept; if they had habitually loved their neighbour—that is, themselves1144

    1144 Semetipsos. ? Each other.

    —they would not have believed the persuasion of the serpent, and thus would not have committed murder upon themselves,1145

    1145 Semetipsos. ? Each other.

    by falling1146

    1146 Excidendo; or, perhaps, “by self-excision,” or “mutual excision.”

    from immortality, by contravening God’s precept; from theft also they would have abstained, if they had not stealthily tasted of the fruit of the tree, nor had been anxious to skulk beneath a tree to escape the view of the Lord their God; nor would they have been made partners with the falsehood-asseverating devil, by believing him that they would be “like God;” and thus they would not have offended God either, as their Father, who had fashioned them from clay of the earth, as out of the womb of a mother; if they had not coveted another’s, they would not have tasted of the unlawful fruit.


    Anf-03 iv.ix.ii Pg 8
    Deut. vi. 4, 5; Lev. xix. 18; comp. Matt. xxii. 34–40; Mark xii. 28–34; Luke x. 25–28; and for the rest, Ex. xx. 12–17; Deut. v. 16–21; Rom. xiii. 9.

    Thou shalt not kill; Thou shalt not commit adultery; Thou shalt not steal; False witness thou shalt not utter; Honour thy father and mother; and, That which is another’s, shalt thou not covet.  For the primordial law was given to Adam and Eve in paradise, as the womb of all the precepts of God. In short, if they had loved the Lord their God, they would not have contravened His precept; if they had habitually loved their neighbour—that is, themselves1144

    1144 Semetipsos. ? Each other.

    —they would not have believed the persuasion of the serpent, and thus would not have committed murder upon themselves,1145

    1145 Semetipsos. ? Each other.

    by falling1146

    1146 Excidendo; or, perhaps, “by self-excision,” or “mutual excision.”

    from immortality, by contravening God’s precept; from theft also they would have abstained, if they had not stealthily tasted of the fruit of the tree, nor had been anxious to skulk beneath a tree to escape the view of the Lord their God; nor would they have been made partners with the falsehood-asseverating devil, by believing him that they would be “like God;” and thus they would not have offended God either, as their Father, who had fashioned them from clay of the earth, as out of the womb of a mother; if they had not coveted another’s, they would not have tasted of the unlawful fruit.


    ecf03Oz2z11, 21:6


    Anf-02 vi.ii.ix Pg 9.1
    1556


    Anf-02 vi.ii.ix Pg 10.1


    Anf-03 iv.iv.xx Pg 9
    Ps. xcvi. 5. The LXX. in whose version ed. Tisch. it is Ps. xcv. read δαιμόνια, like Tertullian. Our version has “idols.”

    But this has been laid by me rather as a foundation for ensuing observations.  However, it is a defect of custom to say, “By Hercules, So help me the god of faith;”329

    329 Mehercule. Medius Fidius. I have given the rendering of the latter, which seems preferred by Paley (Ov. Fast. vi. 213, note), who considers it = me dius (i.e., Deus) fidius juvet.  Smith (Lat. Dict. s.v.) agrees with him, and explains it, me deus fidius servet. White and Riddle (s.v.) take the me (which appears to be short) as a “demonstrative” particle or prefix, and explain, “By the God of truth!” “As true as heaven,” “Most certainly.”

    while to the custom is added the ignorance of some, who are ignorant that it is an oath by Hercules. Further, what will an oath be, in the name of gods whom you have forsworn, but a collusion of faith with idolatry? For who does not honour them in whose name he swears?


    Anf-03 iv.iv.xx Pg 9
    Ps. xcvi. 5. The LXX. in whose version ed. Tisch. it is Ps. xcv. read δαιμόνια, like Tertullian. Our version has “idols.”

    But this has been laid by me rather as a foundation for ensuing observations.  However, it is a defect of custom to say, “By Hercules, So help me the god of faith;”329

    329 Mehercule. Medius Fidius. I have given the rendering of the latter, which seems preferred by Paley (Ov. Fast. vi. 213, note), who considers it = me dius (i.e., Deus) fidius juvet.  Smith (Lat. Dict. s.v.) agrees with him, and explains it, me deus fidius servet. White and Riddle (s.v.) take the me (which appears to be short) as a “demonstrative” particle or prefix, and explain, “By the God of truth!” “As true as heaven,” “Most certainly.”

    while to the custom is added the ignorance of some, who are ignorant that it is an oath by Hercules. Further, what will an oath be, in the name of gods whom you have forsworn, but a collusion of faith with idolatry? For who does not honour them in whose name he swears?


    Anf-01 vi.ii.ii Pg 4
    Isa. i. 11–14, from the Sept., as is the case throughout. We have given the quotation as it stands in Cod. Sin.

    <index subject1="Law of Christ" title="138" id="vi.ii.ii-p4.2"/>He has therefore abolished these things, that the new law of our Lord Jesus Christ, which is without the yoke of necessity, might have a human oblation.1459

    1459 Thus in the Latin. The Greek reads, “might not have a man-made oblation.” The Latin text seems preferable, implying that, instead of the outward sacrifices of the law, there is now required a dedication of man himself. Hilgenfeld follows the Greek.

    And again He says to them, “Did I command your fathers, when they went out from the land of Egypt, to offer unto Me burnt-offerings and sacrifices? But this rather I commanded them, Let no one of you cherish any evil in his heart against his neighbour, and love not an oath of falsehood.”1460

    1460


    Anf-01 viii.ii.xxxvii Pg 4
    Isa. i. 14, Isa. lviii. 6.

    What kind of things are taught through the prophets from [the person of] God, you can now perceive.


    Anf-01 ix.viii.xxxviii Pg 4
    Isa. i. 14.


    Anf-02 vi.iii.iii.xii Pg 27.1


    Anf-03 iv.ix.v Pg 14
    Comp. Isa. i. 11–14, especially in the LXX.

    for “from the rising sun unto the setting, my Name hath been made famous among all the nations, saith the Lord.”1209

    1209


    Anf-03 v.iv.ii.xx Pg 13
    Slightly altered from Isa. i. 13, 14.

    Now, if even the Creator had so long before discarded all these things, and the apostle was now proclaiming them to be worthy of renunciation, the very agreement of the apostle’s meaning with the decrees of the Creator proves that none other God was preached by the apostle than He whose purposes he now wished to have recognised, branding as false both apostles and brethren, for the express reason that they were pushing back the gospel of Christ the Creator from the new condition which the Creator had foretold, to the old one which He had discarded.


    Anf-03 v.iv.iii.xxii Pg 18
    See Isa. i. 11–14.

    By calling them yours, as having been performed2979

    2979 Fecerat seems the better reading: q.d. “which he had performed,” etc. Oehler reads fecerant.

    after the giver’s own will, and not according to the religion of God (since he displayed them as his own, and not as God’s), the Almighty in this passage, demonstrated how suitable to the conditions of the case, and how reasonable, was His rejection of those very offerings which He had commanded to be made to Him.


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xii Pg 40
    Isa. i. 13, 14.

    reckoning them as men’s Sabbaths, not His own, because they were celebrated without the fear of God by a people full of iniquities, and loving God “with the lip, not the heart,”3891

    3891


    Anf-03 iv.iv.xiv Pg 11
    Isa. i. 14, etc.

    By us, to whom Sabbaths are strange,272

    272 [This is noteworthy. In the earlier days sabbaths (Saturdays) were not unobserved, but, it was a concession pro tempore, to Hebrew Christians.]

    and the new moons and festivals formerly beloved by God, the Saturnalia and New-year’s and Midwinter’s festivals and Matronalia are frequented—presents come and go—New-year’s giftsgames join their noise—banquets join their din! Oh better fidelity of the nations to their own sect, which claims no solemnity of the Christians for itself! Not the Lord’s day, not Pentecost, even it they had known them, would they have shared with us; for they would fear lest they should seem to be Christians. We are not apprehensive lest we seem to be heathens! If any indulgence is to be granted to the flesh, you have it. I will not say your own days,273

    273 i.e., perhaps your own birthdays. [See cap. xvi. infra.]  Oehler seems to think it means, “all other Christian festivals beside Sunday.”

    but more too; for to the heathens each festive day occurs but once annually:  you have a festive day every eighth day.274

    274 [“An Easter Day in every week.”—Keble.]

    Call out the individual solemnities of the nations, and set them out into a row, they will not be able to make up a Pentecost.275

    275


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xii Pg 13
    Isa. i. 14.

    Now, in whatever sense these words were spoken, we know that an abrupt defence must, in a subject of this sort, be used in answer to an abrupt challenge. I shall now transfer the discussion to the very matter in which the teaching of Christ seemed to annul the Sabbath. The disciples had been hungry; on that the Sabbath day they had plucked some ears and rubbed them in their hands; by thus preparing their food, they had violated the holy day. Christ excuses them, and became their accomplice in breaking the Sabbath. The Pharisees bring the charge against Him.  Marcion sophistically interprets the stages of the controversy (if I may call in the aid of the truth of my Lord to ridicule his arts), both in the scriptural record and in Christ’s purpose.3864

    3864 This obscure passage runs thus in the original: “Marcion captat status controversiæ (ut aliquid ludam cum mei Domini veritate), scripti et voluntatis.” Status is a technical word in rhetoric. “Est quæstio quæ ex prima causarum conflictione nascitur.” See Cicero, Topic. c. 25, Part. c. 29; and Quinctilian, Instit. Rhetor. iii. 6. (Oehler).

    For from the Creator’s Scripture, and from the purpose of Christ, there is derived a colourable precedent3865

    3865 Sumitur color.

    —as from the example of David, when he went into the temple on the Sabbath, and provided food by boldly breaking up the shew-bread.3866

    3866


    Anf-03 v.iv.vi.iv Pg 29
    Isa. i. 13, 14.

    also by Amos, “I hate, I despise your feast-days, and I will not smell in your solemn assemblies;”5348

    5348


    Anf-01 ix.iv.xx Pg 19
    Isa. vii. 13.

    Wherefore also the Lord Himself gave us a sign, in the depth below, and in the height above, which man did not ask for, because he never expected that a virgin could conceive, or that it was possible that one remaining a virgin could bring forth a son, and that what was thus born should be “God with us,” and descend to those things which are of the earth beneath, seeking the sheep which had perished, which was indeed His own peculiar handiwork, and ascend to the height above, offering and commending to His Father that human nature (hominem) which had been found, making in His own person the first-fruits of the resurrection of man; that, as the Head rose from the dead, so also the remaining part of the body—[namely, the body] of everyman who is found in life—when the time is fulfilled of that condemnation which existed by reason of disobedience, may arise, blended together and strengthened through means of joints and bands3681

    3681


    Anf-01 ix.iv.xxii Pg 18
    Isa. vii. 13.

    He performed the part of one indicating that He whom God promised David that He would raise up from the fruit of his belly (ventris) an eternal King, is the same who was born of the Virgin, herself of the lineage of David. <index subject1="Fruit of the belly and of the loins" title="453" id="ix.iv.xxii-p18.2"/>For on this account also, He promised that the King should be “of the fruit of his belly,” which was the appropriate [term to use with respect] to a virgin conceiving, and not “of the fruit of his loins,” nor “of the fruit of his reins,” which expression is appropriate to a generating man, and a woman conceiving by a man. In this promise, therefore, the Scripture excluded all virile influence; yet it certainly is not mentioned that He who was born was not from the will of man. But it has fixed and established “the fruit of the belly,” that it might declare the generation of Him who should be [born] from the Virgin, as Elisabeth testified when filled with the Holy Ghost, saying to Mary, “Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy belly;”3721

    3721


    Anf-03 iv.ix.ix Pg 4
    See Isa. vii. 13, 14.

    (which is, interpreted, “God with us”1252

    1252


    Anf-01 ix.vi.xviii Pg 17
    Isa. xliii. 23, 24.

    He says, therefore, “Upon this man will I look, even upon him that is humble, and meek, and who trembles at My words.”4021

    4021


    Anf-02 ii.ii.i Pg 23.1


    Anf-02 vi.iii.i.ix Pg 72.1


    Anf-02 vi.iii.i.ix Pg 72.1


    Anf-02 vi.iv.iii Pg 62.1


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxvii Pg 37
    Isa. xxviii. 14.

    and again, “They that demand you shall rule over you.”4610

    4610


    Anf-03 vi.vii.ii Pg 6
    See Ps. lxxiv. 23 in A.V. It is Ps. lxxiii. in the LXX.

    so that by His own patience He disparages Himself; for the cause why many believe not in the Lord is that they are so long without knowing9024

    9024 Because they see no visible proof of it.

    that He is wroth with the world.9025

    9025 Sæculo.



    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxi Pg 23
    Jer. ii. 31.

    That is to say: “Then have I none whom I may call to me; have I no place whence I may bring them?”  “Since my people have said, We will come no more unto thee.”4747

    4747


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxxi Pg 24
    Jer. ii. 31.

    Therefore He sent out to call others, but from the same city.4748

    4748


    Edersheim Bible History

    Lifetimes vii.viii Pg 84.1, Lifetimes vi.vi Pg 39.1


    Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 11

    VERSE 	(1) - 

    Ho 2:15 De 7:7 Jer 2:2 Eze 16:6 Mal 1:2


    PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE

    God Rules.NET