Anf-02 vi.iv.iii Pg 253.1
Anf-03 v.iv.vi.xiii Pg 43
Rom. vii. 4; also Gal. ii. 19. This (although a quotation) is here a Marcionite argument; but there is no need to suppose, with Pamelius, that Marcion tampers with Rom. vi. 2. Oehler also supposes that this is the passage quoted. But no doubt it is a correct quotation from the seventh chapter, as we have indicated.
It may be contended that Christ’s body is indeed a body, but not exactly5826 5826 Statim (or, perhaps, in respect of the derivation), “firmly” or “stedfastly.”
flesh. Now, whatever may be the substance, since he mentions “the body of Christ,”5827 5827 Ejus.
whom he immediately after states to have been “raised from the dead,”5828 5828
Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 2
VERSE (19) - Ga 3:10,24 Ro 3:19,20; 4:15; 5:20; 7:7-11,14,22,23; 8:2; 10:4,5
