King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page




Bad Advertisement?

News & Reviews:
  • World News
  • Movie Reviews
  • Book Search

    Are you a Christian?

    Online Store:
  • Your Own eBook/eBay Business
  • Visit Our eBay Store

    Automated eBook Business



  • PARALLEL HISTORY BIBLE - Acts 1:19


    CHAPTERS: Acts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28     

    VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

    TEXT: BIB   |   AUDIO: MISLR - MISC - DAVIS - FOCHT   |   VIDEO: BIB - COMM


    ENGLISH - HISTORY - INTERNATIONAL - FACEBOOK - GR FORUMS - GODRULES ON YOUTUBE

    HELPS: KJS - KJV - ASV - DBY - DOU - WBS - YLT - HEB - BBE - WEB - NAS - SEV - TSK - CRK - WES - MHC - GILL - JFB

    LXX- Greek Septuagint - Acts 1:19

    και 2532 γνωστον 1110 εγενετο 1096 5633 πασιν 3956 τοις 3588 κατοικουσιν 2730 5723 ιερουσαλημ 2419 ωστε 5620 κληθηναι 2564 5683 το 3588 χωριον 5564 εκεινο 1565 τη 3588 ιδια 2398 διαλεκτω 1258 αυτων 846 ακελδαμα 184 τουτ 5124 εστιν 2076 5748 χωριον 5564 αιματος 129

    Douay Rheims Bible

    And it became known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem: so that the same
    field was called in their tongue, Haceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.

    King James Bible - Acts 1:19

    And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jerusalem; insomuch as that
    field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood.

    World English Bible

    It became known to everyone who lived in Jerusalem that in their language that
    field was called 'Akeldama,' that is, 'The field of blood.'

    Early Church Father Links

    Npnf-111 vi.iii Pg 16, Npnf-208 ix.liv Pg 14

    World Wide Bible Resources


    Acts 1:19

    Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325)

    Anf-01 ix.iv.xiii Pg 8
    Acts ii. 22–27.

    Then he proceeds to speak confidently to them concerning the patriarch David, that he was dead and buried, and that his sepulchre is with them to this day. He said, “But since he was a prophet, and knew that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his body one should sit in his throne; foreseeing this, he spake of the resurrection of Christ, that He was not left in hell, neither did His flesh see corruption. This Jesus,” he said, “hath God raised up, of which we all are witnesses: who, being exalted by the right hand of God, receiving from the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, hath shed forth this gift3472

    3472 The word δῶρον or δώρημα is supposed by some to have existed in the earliest Greek texts, although not found in any extant now. It is thus quoted by others besides Irenæus.

    which ye now see and hear. For David has not ascended into the heavens; but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand, until I make Thy foes Thy footstool. Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.”3473

    3473


    Anf-03 iv.ix.xiii Pg 55
    For this sense of the word “approve,” comp. Acts ii. 22, Greek and English, and Phil. i. 10, Greek and English.

    to be come, let the Jews recognise their own fate,—a fate which they were constantly foretold as destined to incur after the advent of the Christ, on account of the impiety with which they despised and slew Him. For first, from the day when, according to the saying of Isaiah, “a man cast forth his abominations of gold and silver, which they made to adore with vain and hurtful (rites),”1432

    1432


    Anf-03 v.vii.xv Pg 9
    Acts ii. 22.

    These passages alone ought to suffice as a prescriptive7156

    7156 Vice præscriptionis.

    testimony in proof that Christ had human flesh derived from man, and not spiritual, and that His flesh was not composed of soul,7157

    7157 Animalis.

    nor of stellar substance, and that it was not an imaginary flesh; (and no doubt they would be sufficient) if heretics could only divest themselves of all their contentious warmth and artifice. For, as I have read in some writer of Valentinus’ wretched faction,7158

    7158 Factiuncula.

    they refuse at the outset to believe that a human and earthly substance was created7159

    7159 Informatam.

    for Christ, lest the Lord should be regarded as inferior to the angels, who are not formed of earthly flesh; whence, too, it would be necessary that, if His flesh were like ours, it should be similarly born, not of the Spirit, nor of God, but of the will of man. Why, moreover, should it be born, not of corruptible [seed], but of incorruptible? Why, again, since His flesh has both risen and returned to heaven, is not ours, being like His, also taken up at once? Or else, why does not His flesh, since it is like ours, return in like manner to the ground, and suffer dissolution? Such objections even the heathen used constantly to bandy about.7160

    7160 Volutabant: see Lactantius, iv. 22.

    Was the Son of God reduced to such a depth of degradation? Again, if He rose again as a precedent for our hope, how is it that nothing like it has been thought desirable (to happen) to ourselves?7161

    7161 De nobis probatum est: or, perhaps, “has been proved to have happened in our own case.”

    Such views are not improper for heathens and they are fit and natural for the heretics too.  For, indeed, what difference is there between them, except it be that the heathen, in not believing, do believe; while the heretics, in believing, do not believe? Then, again, they read: “Thou madest Him a little less than angels;”7162

    7162


    Anf-03 v.ix.xvii Pg 7
    Acts ii. 22.

    is the Lord of hosts, because all things are by the Father made subject to Him; is the King of Israel because to Him has especially been committed the destiny of that nation; and is likewise “the One that is,” because there are many who are called Sons, but are not. As to the point maintained by them, that the name of Christ belongs also to the Father, they shall hear (what I have to say) in the proper place. Meanwhile, let this be my immediate answer to the argument which they adduce from the Revelation of John: “I am the Lord which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty;”7984

    7984


    Edersheim Bible History

    Lifetimes ix.xxi Pg 41.2


    Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 1

    VERSE 	(19) - 

    Ac 2:22 Mt 28:15


    PARALLEL VERSE BIBLE

    God Rules.NET