King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page

Bad Advertisement?

News & Reviews:
  • World News
  • Movie Reviews
  • Book Search

    Are you a Christian?

    Online Store:
  • Your Own eBook/eBay Business
  • Visit Our eBay Store

    Automated eBook Business


    CHAPTERS: Luke 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24     

    VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80




    LXX- Greek Septuagint - Luke 1:65

    και 2532 εγενετο 1096 5633 επι 1909 παντας 3956 φοβος 5401 τους 3588 περιοικουντας 4039 5723 αυτους 846 και 2532 εν 1722 ολη 3650 τη 3588 ορεινη 3714 της 3588 ιουδαιας 2449 διελαλειτο 1255 5712 παντα 3956 τα 3588 ρηματα 4487 ταυτα 5023

    Douay Rheims Bible

    And fear came upon all their neighbours; and all these things were noised abroad
    over all the hill country of Judea.

    King James Bible - Luke 1:65

    And fear came on all that dwelt
    round about them: and all these sayings were noised abroad throughout all the hill country of Judaea.

    World English Bible

    Fear came on all who lived around them, and all these sayings were talked about throughout all the hill
    country of Judea.

    Early Church Father Links

    Anf-09 iv.iii.i Pg 105, Anf-09 xv.iii.v.vii Pg 13

    World Wide Bible Resources

    Luke 1:65

    Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325)

    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xviii Pg 13
    Luke vii. 16.

    What God?  He, of course, whose people they were, and from whom had come their prophets. But if they glorified the Creator, and Christ (on hearing them, and knowing their meaning) refrained from correcting them even in their very act of invoking4148

    4148 Et quidem adhuc orantes.

    the Creator in that vast manifestation of His glory in this raising of the dead, undoubtedly He either announced no other God but Him, whom He thus permitted to be honoured in His own beneficent acts and miracles, or else how happens it that He quietly permitted these persons to remain so long in their error, especially as He came for the very purpose to cure them of their error? But John is offended4149

    4149 Comp. Epiphanius, Hæres. xlii., Schol. 8, cum Refut.; Tertullian, De Præscript Hæret. 8; and De Bapt. 10.

    when he hears of the miracles of Christ, as of an alien god.4150

    4150 Ut ulterius. This is the absurd allegation of Marcion. So Epiphanius (Le Prieur).

    Well, I on my side4151

    4151 Ego.

    will first explain the reason of his offence, that I may the more easily explode the scandal4152

    4152 Scandalum. Playing on the word “scandalum” in its application to the Baptist and to Marcion.

    of our heretic. Now, that the very Lord Himself of all might, the Word and Spirit of the Father,4153


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xix Pg 20
    In allusion to Luke vii. 16. See above, chap. xviii.

    but still one who had been born as man?  Even if it had been necessary that He should thus be tried in the investigation of His birth, surely any other proof would have better answered the trial than that to be obtained from mentioning those relatives which it was quite possible for Him, in spite of His true nativity, not at that moment to have had. For tell me now, does a mother live on contemporaneously4202

    4202 Advivit.

    with her sons in every case? Have all sons brothers born for them?4203

    4203 Adgenerantur.

    May a man rather not have fathers and sisters (living), or even no relatives at all? But there is historical proof4204

    4204 Constat. [Jarvis, Introd. p. 204 and p. 536.]

    that at this very time4205

    4205 Nunc: i.e., when Christ was told of His mother and brethren.

    a census had been taken in Judæa by Sentius Saturninus,4206

    4206 “C. Sentius Saturninus, a consular, held this census of the whole empire as principal augur, because Augustus determined to impart the sanction of religion to his institution. The agent through whom Saturninus carried out the census in Judæa was the governor Cyrenius, according to Luke, chap. ii.”—Fr. Junius. Tertullian mentions Sentius Saturninus again in De Pallio, i. Tertullian’s statement in the text has weighed with Sanclemente and others, who suppose that Saturninus was governor of Judæa at the time of our Lord’s birth, which they place in 747 a.u.c.  “It is evident, however,” says Wieseler, “that this argument is far from decisive; for the New Testament itself supplies far better aids for determining this question than the discordant ecclesiastical traditions—different fathers giving different dates, which might be appealed to with equal justice; while Tertullian is even inconsistent with himself, since in his treatise Adv. Jud. viii., he gives 751 a.u.c. as the year of our Lord’s birth” (Wieseler’s Chronological Synopsis by Venables, p. 99, note 2). This Sentius Saturninus filled the office of governor of Syria, 744–748. For the elaborate argument of Aug. W. Zumpt, by which he defends St. Luke’s chronology, and goes far to prove that Publius Sulpicius Quirinus (or “Cyrenius”) was actually the governor of Syria at the time of the Lord’s birth, the reader may be referred to a careful abridgment by the translator of Wieseler’s work, pp. 129–135.

    which might have satisfied their inquiry respecting the family and descent of Christ. Such a method of testing the point had therefore no consistency whatever in it and they “who were standing without” were really “His mother and His brethren.” It remains for us to examine His meaning when He resorts to non-literal4207

    4207 Non simpliciter. St. Mark rather than St. Luke is quoted in this interrogative sentence.

    words, saying “Who is my mother or my brethren?” It seems as if His language amounted to a denial of His family and His birth; but it arose actually from the absolute nature of the case, and the conditional sense in which His words were to be explained.4208

    4208 Ex condicione rationali. See Oehler’s note, just above, on the word “rationales.”

    He was justly indignant, that persons so very near to Him “stood without,” while strangers were within hanging on His words, especially as they wanted to call Him away from the solemn work He had in hand. He did not so much deny as disavow4209

    4209 Abdicavit: Rigalt thinks this is harsh, and reminds us that at the cross the Lord had not cast away his Mother. [Elucidation VI.]

    them. And therefore, when to the previous question, “Who is my mother, and who are my brethren?”4210


    Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 1

    VERSE 	(65) - 

    Lu 7:16 Ac 2:43; 5:5,11; 19:17 Re 11:11


    God Rules.NET