King James Bible Adam Clarke Bible Commentary Martin Luther's Writings Wesley's Sermons and Commentary Neurosemantics Audio / Video Bible Evolution Cruncher Creation Science Vincent New Testament Word Studies KJV Audio Bible Family videogames Christian author Godrules.NET Main Page Add to Favorites Godrules.NET Main Page

Bad Advertisement?

News & Reviews:
  • World News
  • Movie Reviews
  • Book Search

    Are you a Christian?

    Online Store:
  • Your Own eBook/eBay Business
  • Visit Our eBay Store

    Automated eBook Business


    CHAPTERS: Luke 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24     

    VERSES: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71




    LXX- Greek Septuagint - Luke 22:57

    ο 3588 δε 1161 ηρνησατο 720 5662 αυτον 846 λεγων 3004 5723 γυναι 1135 ουκ 3756 οιδα 1492 5758 αυτον 846

    Douay Rheims Bible

    But he denied him, saying: Woman, I know him not.

    King James Bible - Luke 22:57

    And he denied him, saying, Woman, I know him not.

    World English Bible

    He denied Jesus, saying, "Woman, I don't know him."

    Early Church Father Links

    Anf-09 iv.iii.xlviii Pg 82

    World Wide Bible Resources

    Luke 22:57

    Early Christian Commentary - (A.D. 100 - A.D. 325)

    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xli Pg 9
    Luke xxii. 34 and 54–; 62.

    The Christ of the prophets was destined, moreover, to be betrayed with a kiss,5101


    Anf-03 v.iv.v.xxviii Pg 12
    Luke xii. 9.

    —by Him, of course, who would have confessed him, if he had only confessed God.  Now, He who will confess the confessor is the very same God who will also deny the denier of Himself. Again, if it is the confessor who will have nothing to fear after his violent death,4630

    4630 Post occisionem.

    it is the denier to whom everything will become fearful after his natural death. Since, therefore, that which will have to be feared after death, even the punishment of hell, belongs to the Creator, the denier, too, belongs to the Creator. As with the denier, however, so with the confessor: if he should deny God, he will plainly have to suffer from God, although from men he had nothing more to suffer after they had put him to death.  And so Christ is the Creator’s, because He shows that all those who deny Him ought to fear the Creator’s hell.  After deterring His disciples from denial of Himself, He adds an admonition to fear blasphemy: “Whosoever shall speak against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever shall speak against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him.”4631


    Anf-02 ii.ii.ii Pg 16.1

    Anf-03 v.ix.xxvi Pg 19
    Matt. x. 32, 33.

    He also introduces a parable of the mission to the vineyard of the Son (not the Father), who was sent after so many servants,8142


    Anf-03 iv.iv.xiii Pg 11
    Matt. x. 33; Mark viii. 38; Luke ix. 26; 2 Tim. ii. 12.

    Anf-03 v.vii.v Pg 11
    Matt. x. 33, Mark viii. 38, and Luke ix. 26.

    Other matters for shame find I none which can prove me to be shameless in a good sense, and foolish in a happy one, by my own contempt of shame. The Son of God was crucified; I am not ashamed because men must needs be ashamed of it.  And the Son of God died; it is by all means to be believed, because it is absurd.7010

    7010 Ineptum.

    And He was buried, and rose again; the fact is certain, because it is impossible.  But how will all this be true in Him, if He was not Himself true—if He really had not in Himself that which might be crucified, might die, might be buried, and might rise again? I mean this flesh suffused with blood, built up with bones, interwoven with nerves, entwined with veins, a flesh which knew how to be born, and how to die, human without doubt, as born of a human being. It will therefore be mortal in Christ, because Christ is man and the Son of man.  Else why is Christ man and the Son of man, if he has nothing of man, and nothing from man? Unless it be either that man is anything else than flesh, or man’s flesh comes from any other source than man, or Mary is anything else than a human being, or Marcion’s man is as Marcion’s god.7011

    7011 That is, imaginary and unreal.

    Otherwise Christ could not be described as being man without flesh, nor the Son of man without any human parent; just as He is not God without the Spirit of God, nor the Son of God without having God for His father. Thus the nature7012

    7012 Census: “the origin.”

    of the two substances displayed Him as man and God,—in one respect born, in the other unborn; in one respect fleshly, in the other spiritual; in one sense weak, in the other exceeding strong; in one sense dying, in the other living. This property of the two states—the divine and the human—is distinctly asserted7013

    7013 Dispuncta est.

    with equal truth of both natures alike, with the same belief both in respect of the Spirit7014

    7014 This term is almost a technical designation of the divine nature of Christ in Tertullian. (See our translation of the Anti-Marcion, p. 247, note 7, Edin.)

    and of the flesh. The powers of the Spirit,7015

    7015 This term is almost a technical designation of the divine nature of Christ in Tertullian. (See our translation of the Anti-Marcion, p. 247, note 7, Edin.)

    proved Him to be God, His sufferings attested the flesh of man. If His powers were not without the Spirit7016

    7016 This term is almost a technical designation of the divine nature of Christ in Tertullian. (See our translation of the Anti-Marcion, p. 247, note 7, Edin.)

    in like manner, were not His sufferings without the flesh. If His flesh with its sufferings was fictitious, for the same reason was the Spirit false with all its powers. Wherefore halve7017

    7017 Dimidias.

    Christ with a lie? He was wholly the truth. Believe me, He chose rather to be born, than in any part to pretend—and that indeed to His own detriment—that He was bearing about a flesh hardened without bones, solid without muscles, bloody without blood, clothed without the tunic of skin,7018

    7018 See his Adv. Valentin, chap. 25.

    hungry without appetite, eating without teeth, speaking without a tongue, so that His word was a phantom to the ears through an imaginary voice. A phantom, too, it was of course after the resurrection, when, showing His hands and His feet for the disciples to examine, He said, “Behold and see that it is I myself, for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have;”7019


    Anf-03 v.viii.xiii Pg 4
    Matt. x. 33.

    well, if not better than many a phœnix too, it were no great thing. But must men die once for all, while birds in Arabia are sure of a resurrection?

    Edersheim Bible History

    Lifetimes x.xiii Pg 1.9

    Treasury of Scriptural Knowledge, Chapter 22

    VERSE 	(57) - 

    :33,34; 12:9 Mt 10:33; 26:70 Joh 18:25,27 Ac 3:13,14,19 2Ti 2:10-12


    God Rules.NET